Blogs

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: Could the Cigarette Companies Actually

One of the deeply ingrained pieces of dogma that I was taught as a young anti-smoking advocate is that the cigarette companies are never right. Everything they say is false, every argument they make is invalid, and we in tobacco control are always right. < br / > < br / > To be sure, there is still

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: Social Stigma Created by Anti-Smoker

In my < a href="http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2011/12/lessons-learned-in-2011-reflections-on.html" > last post < /a > of 2011, I suggested that the anti-smoking movement has recently changed from a focus on fighting tobacco smoke exposure to a near obsession with fighting smokers themselves.

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: Third Place Finisher of Liar, Liar,

Today I announce the 3rd place finisher in my annual Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire Award for the worst public lie in the tobacco control field in 2011 (the Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire Award name is borrowed from < span style="font-style: italic;" > PolitiFact < /span > , which < a

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: 2011 Hypocrisy of the Year Award

As the holidays approach, < span style="font-style: italic;" > The Rest of the Story < /span > will be posting a number of end-of-the-year features, including the eagerly-awaited annual Hypocrisy of the Year awards and the highly-anticipated Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire awards. < br / > < br / > We

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: IN MY VIEW: IOM Report Essentially

In the last two days, I have commented on two aspects of the IOM < a href="http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13294" > report < /a > on modified risk tobacco products. First, I < a href="http://tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com/2011/12/iom-report-on-modified-risk-tobacco.html" > argued < /a > that

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: IOM Report on Modified Risk Tobacco

The Institute of Medicine last week released its long-awaited < a href="http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13294" > report < /a > on the scientific evidence required to support designation of tobacco products as modified risk products under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: IN MY VIEW: Anti-Smoking Advocates

On the Smokefree DC < a href="http://www.smokefreedc.org/2011/08/nonsmokerssecondhand-smok/#more-448" > web site < /a > , an anti-smoking researcher/advocate posted a comment which claims that Michael McFadden is a tobacco industry mole, meaning an individual affiliated with the tobacco companies

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: Preliminary Injunction Issued Against

< div class="blogger-post-footer" > < img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/11234862-5371052321301200508?l=tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com' alt='' / > < /div >

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: Hearing on Cigarette Warnings Reveals

I have been writing for the past several weeks about what I see as a key issue in the lawsuit regarding the FDA's proposed cigarette warning labels: whether the proposed labels represent merely warnings about the health effects of smoking or whether they are really anti-smoking advertisements

The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: Two Advertising Industry Groups Join

Two advertising industry groups have filed amicus briefs with the D.C. District Court, seeking to join the lawsuit by several tobacco companies, which seek an injunction against the FDA's proposal to require graphic warning labels on cigarette packages. < br / > < br / > According to an < a

Results 1-10 of 113
 

Refine by Topic:



Refine by Content Type:

  • Refined by: Blogs  


Refine by Source:

Choose a source :

Close

1 Sources ...