News and Blogs

Total : 549 View more »
Fannie Mae Redemption
www.prnewswire.com
050% January 21, 2011 3136F9YK3 October 21, 2008 $250,000,000 MTN 4.710% October 22, 2009 31398AHQ8 October 22 2008 $50,000,000 MTN 5.125% April 22, 2011 3136F8UD5 October 22, 2008 $50,000,000 MTN 5.150% October 22, 2012 3136F8UJ2 October 22, 2008 $250,000,000 MTN 5.
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/10-10-2008/0004901737&EDATE=
Freddie Mac Financing Locked In for 192-Unit Seattle-Area M-F
www.commercialpropertynews.com | Oct 7, 2008
Commercial Real Estate Financing - CPN has all the latest commercial real estate finance news and headlines in banking, investing, and mortgages.
CUTTING LOSSES: Fed Takeover of Mortgage Giants Prompts Concern Over "Unintended Consequences"
www.costar.com | Sep 10, 2008
The extraordinary federal government bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - momentous as it was for one day on the stock markets - still is fraught with uncertainties and unknown...
http://www.costar.com/News/Article.aspx?id=7FF4C2C93848EC3652787E2F2A82A7B1&ref=1&src=rss
Backed into a bailout
www.boston.com | Sep 9, 2008
Researchers at Brigham & Women's hospital have intriguing reports that tie asthma with a history of trauma or abus
Web Sites

Total : 383 View more »
HomePath: Home Buyers: I want to buy a home that's owned by Fannie Mae
Interested in buying a property owned by Fannie Mae? Fannie Mae owns thousands of homes at all price levels throughout the country. You can use our search tool to view those properties. Why does Fannie Mae have properties for sale?
The Washington Report
President-Elect Charles McMillan Meets with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac On April 30, 2008, NAR President-Elect Charles McMillan met separately with Fannie Mae President and Chief Executive Officer Dan Mudd and Freddie Mac Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer Patti Cook.
FNMA and FHLMC - Fannie and Freddie
Fannie Mae is a private, shareholder-owned company that works to make sure mortgage money is available for people in communities all across America. They do not lend money directly to home buyers.
http://www.goodmortgage.com/Learn/Terms/Fannie_And_Freddie.html
Foreclosures and Foreclosed Homes - Free Foreclosure Listings
Similar to Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae more officially, the Federal National Mortgage Association is one of the larger companies in the secondary mortgage market. In the secondary mortgage market, lenders can sell mortgages to companies like Fannie Mae.
http://www.registryline.com/buy_fannie_mae_foreclosure_home.php
News from Zibb.com
Total : 914 View more »
Fannie Mae Redemption - Zibb.com
WASHINGTON, Oct 10, 2008 (PR Newswire Europe via COMTEX) --
Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM) will redeem the principal amount indicated for the following securities issue on the redemption date indicated below at a redemption price equal to 100 percent of the principal amount redeemed, plus accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption:
All amounts in US dollars unless otherwise noted.
Principal Security Interest Maturity Date CUSIP Redemption
Amount Type Rate Date
$40,000,000 MTN 4.050% January 21, 2011 3136F9YK3 October 21,
2008
$250,000,000 MTN 4.710% October 22, 2009 31398AHQ8 October 22
2008
$50,000,000 MTN 5.125% April 22, 2011 3136F8UD5 October 22,
2008
$50,000,000 MTN 5.150% October 22, 2012 3136F8UJ2 October 22,
2008
$250,000,000 MTN 5.375% October 22, 2012 31398AHY1 October 22,
2008
$50,000,000 MTN 5.160% October 23, 2009 3136F74F1 October 23,
2008
$25,000,000 MTN 3.170% April 23, 2010 3136F9MB6 October 23,
2008
$25,000,000 MTN 3.270% April 23, 2010 3136F9MH3 October 23,
2008
Fannie Mae exists to expand affordable housing and bring global capital to local communities in order to serve the U.S. housing market. Fannie Mae has a federal charter and operates in America's secondary mortgage market to enhance the liquidity of the mortgage market by providing funds to mortgage bankers and other lenders so that they may lend to home buyers. In 2008, we mark our 70th year of service to America's housing market. Our job is to help those who house America.
This press release does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy securities of Fannie Mae. Nothing in this press release constitutes advice on the merits of buying or selling a particular investment. Any investment decision as to any purchase of securities referred to herein must be made solely on the basis of information contained in Fannie Mae's applicable Offering Circular, and that no reliance may be placed on the completeness or accuracy of the information contained in this press release.
You should not deal in securities unless you understand their nature and the extent of your exposure to risk. You should be satisfied that they are suitable for you in the light of your circumstances and financial position. If you are in any doubt you should consult an appropriately qualified financial advisor.
Web site: http://www.fanniemae.com
Latressa Cox of Fannie Mae, +1-202-752-6707
Tags: fannie mae federal housing investment local market mortgage nyse securities security web
Companies: Fannie Mae (FNM)
Setting the Record Straight: Six Years of Unheeded Warnings for GSE Reform - Zibb.com
Oct 10, 2008 (WHITE HOUSE RELEASE/ContentWorks via COMTEX) --
Setting the Record Straight: Six Years of Unheeded Warnings for GSE Reform The Washington Times Fails To Research The Administration's Efforts To Reform Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac
In Focus: Setting the Record Straight In Focus: Economy
Today, the Washington Times incorrectly accused the White House of ignoring warnings of trouble ahead for government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and neglecting to "adopt any reform until this summer," when it was too late. "Neither the White House nor Congress heeded the warnings, Fannie and Freddie retained strong bipartisan support during the 1990s and early part of this decade." (Editorial, "Hear, See And Speak No Evil About Fannie And Freddie," The Washington Times, 10/9/08)
Over the past six years, the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of failure to reform GSEs but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. In fact, it was Congress that flatly rejected President Bush's call more than five years ago to reform the GSEs. Over the years, the President's repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems with the GSEs.
2001
*April: The Administration's FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is "a potential problem," because "financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity." (2002 Budget Analytic Perspectives, pg. 142)
2002
*May: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in the President's 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)
2003
*February: The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) releases a report explaining that unexpected problems at a GSE could immediately spread into financial sectors beyond the housing market.
*September: Then-Treasury Secretary John Snow testifies before the House Financial Services Committee to recommend that Congress enact "legislation to create a new Federal agency to regulate and supervise the financial activities of our housing-related government sponsored enterprises" and set prudent and appropriate minimum capital adequacy requirements.
*September: Then-House Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Barney Frank (D-MA) strongly disagrees with the Administration's assessment, saying "these two entities - Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - are not facing any kind of financial crisis ... The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing." (Stephen Labaton, "New Agency Proposed To Oversee Freddie Mac And Fannie Mae," The New York Times, 9/11/03)
*October: Senator Thomas Carper (D-DE) refuses to acknowledge any necessity for GSE reforms, saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." (Sen. Carper, Hearing of Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 10/16/03)
*November: Then-Council of the Economic Advisers (CEA) Chairman Greg Mankiw explains that any "legislation to reform GSE regulation should empower the new regulator with sufficient strength and credibility to reduce systemic risk." To reduce the potential for systemic instability, the regulator would have "broad authority to set both risk-based and minimum capital standards" and "receivership powers necessary to wind down the affairs of a troubled GSE." (N. Gregory Mankiw, Remarks At The Conference Of State Bank Supervisors State Banking Summit And Leadership, 11/6/03)
2004
*February: The President's FY05 Budget again highlights the risk posed by the explosive growth of the GSEs and their low levels of required capital and calls for creation of a new, world-class regulator: "The Administration has determined that the safety and soundness regulators of the housing GSEs lack sufficient power and stature to meet their responsibilities, and therefore ... should be replaced with a new strengthened regulator." (2005 Budget Analytic Perspectives, pg. 83)
*February: Then-CEA Chairman Mankiw cautions Congress to "not take [the financial market's] strength for granted." Again, the call from the Administration was to reduce this risk by "ensuring that the housing GSEs are overseen by an effective regulator." (N. Gregory Mankiw, Op-Ed, "Keeping Fannie And Freddie's House In Order," Financial Times, 2/24/04)
*April: Rep. Frank ignores the warnings, accusing the Administration of creating an "artificial issue." At a speech to the Mortgage Bankers Association conference, Rep. Frank said "people tend to pay their mortgages. I don't think we are in any remote danger here. This focus on receivership, I think, is intended to create fears that aren't there." ("Frank: GSE Failure A Phony Issue," American Banker, 4/21/04)
*June: Then-Treasury Deputy Secretary Samuel Bodman spotlights the risk posed by the GSEs and calls for reform, saying "We do not have a world-class system of supervision of the housing government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), even though the importance of the housing financial system that the GSEs serve demands the best in supervision to ensure the long-term vitality of that system. Therefore, the Administration has called for a new, first class, regulatory supervisor for the three housing GSEs: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banking System." (Samuel Bodman, House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Testimony, 6/16/04)
2005
*April: Then-Secretary Snow repeats his call for GSE reform, saying "Events that have transpired since I testified before this Committee in 2003 reinforce concerns over the systemic risks posed by the GSEs and further highlight the need for real GSE reform to ensure that our housing finance system remains a strong and vibrant source of funding for expanding homeownership opportunities in America ... Half-measures will only exacerbate the risks to our financial system." (Secretary John W. Snow, "Testimony Before The U.S. House Financial Services Committee," 4/13/05)
*July: Then-Minority Leader Harry Reid rejects legislation reforming GSEs, "while I favor improving oversight by our federal housing regulators to ensure safety and soundness, we cannot pass legislation that could limit Americans from owning homes and potentially harm our economy in the process." ("Dems Rip New Fannie Mae Regulatory Measure," United Press International, 7/28/05)
2007
*August: President Bush emphatically calls on Congress to pass a reform package for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, saying "first things first when it comes to those two institutions. Congress needs to get them reformed, get them streamlined, get them focused, and then I will consider other options." (President George W. Bush, Press Conference, the White House, 8/9/07)
*August: Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Chairman Christopher Dodd ignores the President's warnings and calls on him to "immediately reconsider his ill-advised" position. (Eric Dash, "Fannie Mae's Offer To Help Ease Credit Squeeze Is Rejected, As Critics Complain Of Opportunism," The New York Times, 8/11/07)
*December: President Bush again warns Congress of the need to pass legislation reforming GSEs, saying "These institutions provide liquidity in the mortgage market that benefits millions of homeowners, and it is vital they operate safely and operate soundly. So I've called on Congress to pass legislation that strengthens independent regulation of the GSEs - and ensures they focus on their important housing mission. The GSE reform bill passed by the House earlier this year is a good start. But the Senate has not acted. And the United States Senate needs to pass this legislation soon." (President George W. Bush, Discusses Housing, the White House, 12/6/07)
2008
*February: Assistant Treasury Secretary David Nason reiterates the urgency of reforms, saying "A new regulatory structure for the housing GSEs is essential if these entities are to continue to perform their public mission successfully." (David Nason, Testimony On Reforming GSE Regulation, Senate Committee On Banking, Housing And Urban Affairs, 2/7/08)
*March: President Bush calls on Congress to take action and "move forward with reforms on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They need to continue to modernize the FHA, as well as allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to homeowners to refinance their mortgages." (President George W. Bush, Remarks To The Economic Club Of New York, New York, NY, 3/14/08)
*April: President Bush urges Congress to pass the much needed legislation and "modernize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. [There are] constructive things Congress can do that will encourage the housing market to correct quickly by ... helping people stay in their homes." (President George W. Bush, Meeting With Cabinet, the White House, 4/14/08)
*May: President Bush issues several pleas to Congress to pass legislation reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before the situation deteriorates further.
*"Americans are concerned about making their mortgage payments and keeping their homes. Yet Congress has failed to pass legislation I have repeatedly requested to modernize the Federal Housing Administration that will help more families stay in their homes, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow state housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance sub-prime loans." (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/3/08)
*"[T]he government ought to be helping creditworthy people stay in their homes. And one way we can do that - and Congress is making progress on this - is the reform of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That reform will come with a strong, independent regulator." (President George W. Bush, Meeting With The Secretary Of The Treasury, the White House, 5/19/08)
*"Congress needs to pass legislation to modernize the Federal Housing Administration, reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure they focus on their housing mission, and allow State housing agencies to issue tax-free bonds to refinance subprime loans." (President George W. Bush, Radio Address, 5/31/08)
*June: As foreclosure rates continued to rise in the first quarter, the President once again asks Congress to take the necessary measures to address this challenge, saying "we need to pass legislation to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac." (President George W. Bush, Remarks At Swearing In Ceremony For Secretary Of Housing And Urban Development, Washington, D.C., 6/6/08)
*July: Congress heeds the President's call for action and passes reform legislation for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as it becomes clear that the institutions are failing.
*September: Democrats in Congress forget their previous objections to GSE reforms, as Senator Dodd questions "why weren't we doing more, why did we wait almost a year before there were any significant steps taken to try to deal with this problem? ... I have a lot of questions about where was the administration over the last eight years." (Dawn Kopecki, "Fannie Mae, Freddie 'House Of Cards' Prompts Takeover," Bloomberg, 9/9/08)
# # #
Tags: banking budget bush cabinet conference congress corporate economy fannie mae federal finance financial services freddie mac government housing legislation market mortgage new_york president radio rates research senate takeover tax treasury washington
Companies: Fannie Mae (FNM)
Lead Plaintiff Deadline Approaching for Preferred Stock, Series 2008-1 Shareholders of Fannie Mae
NEW YORK, Oct 10, 2008 (GlobeNewswire via COMTEX) --
Purchasers of the Federal National Mortgage Association a/k/a Fannie Mae's ("Fannie Mae" or the "Company") (NYSE:FNM) $2.25 billion offering of 8.75% Non-Cumulative Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock, Series 2008-1 (the "Offering"), are reminded that November 7, 2008 is the deadline to petition the Court to be appointed Lead plaintiff. Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP (www.pomerantzlaw.com) ("Pomerantz") filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, against J. P. Morgan Securities, Inc. (NYSE:JPM); Lehman Brothers, Inc. (Pink Sheets:LEHMQ); Banc of America Securities LLC (NYSE:BAC); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (NYSE:MER); and Goldman Sachs & Co. (NYSE:GS) (collectively, the "Underwriter Defendants"); and certain officers of the companies. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The class action was filed on behalf of investors who purchased the Offering on or about May 14, 2008 through September 5, 2008 (the "Class").
The Offering involved the sale of approximately 45 million shares of non-cumulative, convertible preferred stock. It was part of Fannie Mae's effort to raise at least $6 billion in new capital through public offerings of new securities during May, 2008. The new capital was to help shore up the Company's balance sheet so that capital requirements could continue to be satisfied, enhance shareholder value and provide stability to the secondary mortgage market. Fannie Mae's senior officers, defendants here, repeatedly assured the marketplace that this round of capital-raising would put the company on a sound financial footing and that they believed that additional infusions of cash would not be necessary for the foreseeable future.
The five Underwriter Defendants were the underwriters for the Offering. As such, they participated in the review and drafting of the Offering Circular, which was the official sales document for the Offering, solicited sales of the Offer, and identified themselves, on the cover of the Offering Circular, as the underwriters for the Offering. The Underwriter Defendants purchased 45 million shares of the Offering, delivered the Offering Circular to prospective investors, and resold those shares to investors in the Offering.
The complaint alleges that the Underwriter Defendants' statements made in connection with the Offering were materially false and misleading because (a) they grossly overstated Fannie Mae's capitalization, claiming that the Company had a substantial capital surplus when, in fact, it was including on its balance sheet, at full value, about $36 billion in deferred tax assets that were, in fact, valueless; (b) they failed to disclose the serious risk that current account changes under consideration by the FASB could force the Company to bring over $2 trillion of currently off-balance-sheet obligations onto its financial statements, depleting its capital surplus even further; and (c) the individual defendants falsely asserted that management believed that the current securities offerings of the company would be adequate to see the Company through the end of the year.
Lead plaintiffs must meet certain legal requirements. Shareholders outside the United States may join the action. If you wish to review a copy of the Complaint, to discuss this action, or have any questions, please contact Teresa L. Webb (tlwebb@pomlaw.com) of the Pomerantz Firm at 888.476.6529 (or 888.4-POMLAW), toll free. Those who inquire by e-mail are encouraged to include their mailing address and telephone number.
The Pomerantz Firm, which has offices in New York, Chicago, Washington, D.C., Columbus, Ohio and the San Francisco Bay area, is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz, known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 70 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members.
This news release was distributed by GlobeNewswire, www.globenewswire.com
SOURCE: Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP
Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP
Teresa Webb
(888) 476.6529
(888) 4.POMLAW
tlwebb@pomlaw.com
Tags: antitrust capitalization corporate e-mail fannie mae lawsuit legal market mortgage new_york nyse ohio sales securities tax
Companies: Bank of America Corp. (BAC), Fannie Mae (FNM), Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS), J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. (JPM), Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (LEHMQ), Merrill Lynch & Co Inc (MER)
Emerson Poynter LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Fannie Mae On Behalf of Series S Preferred
LITTLE ROCK, Ark., Oct 10, 2008 (GlobeNewswire via COMTEX) --
Emerson Poynter LLP (www.emersonpoynter.com), a national law firm with offices in Little Rock, Arkansas and Houston, Texas, announces that it filed, on October 8, 2008, a class action lawsuit against Fannie Mae (NSYE:FNM) on behalf of purchasers of Fannie Mae's 8.25% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series S who purchased the stock between December 11, 2007 and September 5, 2008, inclusive (the "Class Period"). Fannie Mae is the nation's largest source of financing for home mortgages. The action was filed in the United States District Court for Southern District of New York (08-CIV-8609).
In the complaint, plaintiffs allege that the defendants -- including several former officers and directors of Fannie Mae and the underwriters responsible for the Series S preferred stock offering -- knew or recklessly disregarded that Fannie Mae was grossly undercapitalized, in violation of Federal regulations, because of its overwhelming investments in subprime and Alt-A mortgages. These assets were not properly accounted for in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Fannie Mae's capital deficiency also was concealed because its deferred tax assets and guaranty obligations were not properly accounted for in violation of GAAP.
Since Fannie Mae was placed in conservatorship by the federal government, the price of its Series S preferred stock has declined precipitously from the $25 offering price and reached a low of $1.51/share -- roughly 94% less than its offered value -- on September 18, 2008.
If you purchased Fannie Mae's 8.25% Fixed to Floating Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series S between December 11, 2007 and September 5, 2008, please contact us about your rights and potential claims. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the court by November 7, 2008.
Emerson Poynter LLP has a national and international class action legal practice with offices in Little Rock, Arkansas and Houston, Texas. Emerson Poynter handles complex commercial litigation with a concentration in those cases that involve violations of federal and state securities or antitrust laws, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), and consumer protection laws. The Firm has substantial experience in litigating large complex class action cases and serves in a leadership position in numerous cases.
This news release was distributed by GlobeNewswire, www.globenewswire.com
SOURCE: Emerson Poynter LLP
Emerson Poynter LLP
John G. Emerson, Esq
Scott E. Poynter, Esq
501.907.2555
800.663.9817
Fax: 501.907.2556
fanniemae@emersonpoynter.com
500 President Clinton Ave, Suite 305
Little Rock, AR 72201
Tags: accounting antitrust arkansas commercial consumer fannie mae federal gaap government lawsuit legal regulations retirement security tax
Companies: Fannie Mae (FNM)
News from Zibb.com
- Fannie Mae Redemption - Zibb.com
- Setting the Record Straight: Six Years of Unheeded Warnings for GSE Reform - Zibb.com
- Lead Plaintiff Deadline Approaching for Preferred Stock, Series 2008-1 Shareholders of Fannie Mae
- Emerson Poynter LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Fannie Mae On Behalf of Series S Preferred
Explore Related Products
- Venture Capital
- Domestic Building Contractors
- Building Development
- Household Insurance
- Landscape Architects
- Project Management
- Vocational Training
- Corporate Coaching
- Data Recovery
- Design Services
- Direct Marketing
- Document Scanning
Explore in Related Industries
- Fannie Mae in:
- Finance & Tax (273)
- Construction (37)
- Hospitality (8)
- General Business (6)
