Case Studies
Research standard violations Case study 1 Source: Committee on Publication Ethics, Case 04/38...
Research standard violations Case study 1 Source: Committee on Publication Ethics, Case 04/38 Consent and ethics approval questioned after acceptance In a paper detailing a physiological study of healthy human volunteers the authors stated that ethics committee approval had been granted and that
Reviewer bias or competitive harmful acts by reviewers Case study 1 Source: Committee on...
Reviewer bias or competitive harmful acts by reviewers Case study 1 Source: Committee on Publication Ethics, Case 01/24 Submission of a paper by a reviewer An editor sent out a paper to three reviewers. One of them, who gave the paper a favourable review, enclosed a research letter on the same
Multiple, duplicate, concurrent publication/Simultaneous submission Case study 1 Major overlap...
Multiple, duplicate, concurrent publication/Simultaneous submission Case study 1 Major overlap between an author’s submitted and their already published papers Journal Z published by another publisher received article 0 as a submission for publication. The reviewer for article 0 did a literature
Reviewer bias or competitive harmful acts by reviewers Case study 2 Source: Committee on...
Reviewer bias or competitive harmful acts by reviewers Case study 2 Source: Committee on Publication Ethics, Case 05/02 Reviewer/author conflict of interest Dr B accepted an invitation to review a manuscript for Journal A. Dr B was aware only of the title of the manuscript and had read the
T Reviewer bias or competitive acts by reviewers Case study 2 The COPE Report 2005, Reviewer/Author...
T Reviewer bias or competitive acts by reviewers Case study 2 The COPE Report 2005, Reviewer/Author Conflict of interest (2005) Dr B accepted an invitation to review a manuscript for Journal A. Dr B was aware only of the title of the manuscript and had read the abstract before accepting the
T Research Standard Violations The COPE Report 2005/ Consent and ethics approval questioned after...
T Research Standard Violations The COPE Report 2005/ Consent and ethics approval questioned after acceptance (2004) In a paper detailing a physiological study of healthy human volunteers the authors stated that ethics committee approval had been granted and that the participants had given
T Multiple Publication Case Study 1 Journal Z published by another publisher received article 0 as...
T Multiple Publication Case Study 1 Journal Z published by another publisher received article 0 as a submission for publication. The reviewer for article 0 did a literature search and found that article 0 had major overlap with two articles already published by the same author, article 1
Page:
